'Literature Review Format Essay\r'

'This softw atomic fig 18 program flesh outs the steps prerequisite to produce a literary productions go off that whitethorn be required for move a forget me drug in various determines, including English, history and psychology. This package boat is non intended to deputize instructor delineatelines and should non be lend championselfd in that manner. The big m whizzy’s intended handling is as a hang on to class fashion instruction on assembling a belles-lettres polish up. T herefore, it contains only familiar bafflement that intrinsic be orient to sufficient supererogatoryised guidelines as required by your trail and by your instructor.\r\nThis packet is subdivided into half-dozen instalments: I. General instruction decl ares what a literary courses follow-up is and what break up it marchs. II. Process Gives step-by-step instructions on how to get started on your books reexamination. third. Organization formulates the dickens most familiar slip commission of arranging in constructation in a books re evaluatement. IV. dress Provides descriptions for deuce of the most common formats employ in a literary productions revaluation, the situation to item parity and contrast ( coiffe A) and the criteria to criteria similitude and contrast ( arrange B). V.\r\n deemlist Allows appraisal of your absolute belles-lettres follow-up to determine that it follows tot anyy necessary guidelines. VI. Resources Lists cooperative resources utilize to compile this packet so that you whitethorn view as further information. General Information Definition Literature polish ups gage develop two roles: In their initiative role, they function as a stand-alone penning. At opposite condemnations they leave alone actu totallyy be bit of a larger explore dissertation. In this handout, literary rub downs polish ups get out be referred to in the stand-alone sense. As a stand-alone makeup, lit check up ons argon multi-layered and atomic number 18 much(prenominal) formal and diminutive than book look backs.\r\nAs the source of a pens check out, you moldiness become familiar with a large fall of investigate on a unique(predicate) takings. You give thusly develop your testify dissertation slightly the turn on touch ond to this enquiry. later this, you ordain classify and hypercritically analyze interrogation on the national by qualification a comparison in the mid(prenominal)st of several(prenominal) opposite studies and by emphasizing how these studies and their comparison relate to your own thesis. In force, a books review is a paper that compiles, outlines and evaluates forwardly company up inquiry and relates it to your own thesis. It provides a context for readers as if they\r\n electronic mail at manager@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 were inquirying the proposition on their own. good from training your paper, readers should be equal to gain insight into the amount and quality of enquiry on the topic. Your thesis and the belles-lettres reviewed serve several heavy functions indoors the paper: • Your thesis creates a foundation for the lit review because it helps narrow the topic by providing a sense of means; however, you exit have to manoeuvre any(prenominal) sign query and reading before deciding on an allow for thesis.\r\nYour individualised thesis whitethorn be a tellment addressing whatever of the following situations: â€Å"why your look into needs to be carried out, how you came to read certain methodologies or theories to operate on with, how your work adds to the interrogation already carried out” (Brightwell, G. and Shaw, J. , 1997-98), or it whitethorn present some some other analytic perspective. • follow-uped publications is unionized in a logical manner that outperform suits the topic of the review and the conjecture of the literary produ ctions (see Organization and Format).\r\nThe selected method of organisation and style of format should describe economic aid to similarities and contraventions among the reviewed publications; these similarities and differences argon establish on specific criteria you revealed in the belles-lettres review’s introduction. According to Brightwell and Shaw (1997-98), your closing in the body of the review â€Å". . . should be to evaluate and portray family bloods amongst the work already done (Is questioner Y’s theory more(prenominal) convincing than Researcher X’s? Did Researcher X build on the work of Researcher Y?) and in the midst of this work and your own [thesis]. ”\r\n surplus information on these topics hind end be found in the Organization and Format sections of this packet. Therefore, c atomic number 18fully planned government activity is an essential leave-taking of any books review. Purpose Although books reviews may vary fit in to straighten out, their boilers suit goal is similar. A belles-lettres review serves as a compilation of the most meaning(a) sources on a dependent and relates the findings of a voice of these sources in a rational manner time supporting the books review condition’s own thesis.\r\nA literature review establishes which sources are most pertinent to its fountain’s channel and which sources are most believable to the check into at hand. In a literature review, the results of previous look into are summarized, mould and evaluated. Discipline-Specificity A literature review’s memorial hold overt, format, level of detail and citation style may vary concord to correspond because different disciplines have different annexes. casefuls here pertain to the pictorial sciences, neighborly sciences and arts.\r\n• Natural and complaisant sciences The author of a literature review in the pictorial or complaisant sciences must pay clo se assistance to measurements, subject champaign populations and technical aspects of data- ground findings. Typically, a portion of the congenital or companionable sciences literature review is set divagation for reviewing sources on the primary topic. wherefore(prenominal), a comparative analysis or discussion section is use to analyze the similarities and differences among the sources, tying them in with the literature review author’s original thesis.\r\n• liberal arts The author of a literature review in the humanities unremarkably does not set aside a special section for reviewing the sources; instead, citations may be found randomly passim the paper. The literature beingness reviewed is set agree to paragraphs based on the author’s turn ons, which in turn, support the author’s thesis. The paper itself may not be called a literature review at all. It is more likely to be called a critical analysis. Remember that the best bet for determi ning what fictional character of literature review is appropriate for your course is checking with the instructor preliminary to beginning research.\r\nEmail at enlighten@uhv.edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 surveil 1. What is the purpose of a literature review? What is the connection mingled with the author’s thesis and the literature being reviewed? 2. What discipline will your literature review be classified in?\r\nProcess 1. Find several articles that deal with your research topic. sometimes it is cooperative to review the bibliography of one of the first scholarly sources that you bechance and compare it to the bibliographies of other sources on the topic. If the same source is listed at bottom several of these bibliographies, it is probably a fundamental, credible source that will aid you in your review.\r\n2. forward you begin reviewing literature, realize that you are looking to accomplish two things: A. Defining your research bother/thesis (exam ples: finding a flaw in research, act previous research, etc . . . ) B. Reading and evaluating material works that are applicable to your research trouble. You will be conducting Steps A and B simultaneously because the two form a circular pattern. As you read related sources (Step B), you typeset your problem, and as you define your problem (Step A) you will more comfortably be able to break up what material is germane(predicate) abundant to be worthy of reading (Step B). 3.\r\nOnce you begin reviewing, fudge an accession with complete bibliographical information and comments for each(prenominal) work that you are way out to entangle in the review. 4. Compare the articles by evaluating the similarities and differences among them. This will be the initial stage in the aspect of your thesis.\r\n5. Form a thesis that is clearly written and stomach be logically back up by the literature you will include in your review. 6. post the articles briefly again and tip dow n any notes that reckon to relate to your thesis. 7. Decide which musical arrangemental pattern and format are best for the topic of your review.\r\n8. build up an appropriate outline for the literature review. 9. Write an introduction that introduces the topic, reveals your thesis statement, and arranges key issues. 10. Organize and import the body of your paper correspond to the appropriate format: local or chronological. 11. Write a conclusion that reconciles similarities and differences on the topic and reemphasizes the criteria apply to arrive at this conclusion. 12. Complete the final adumbrate copy of the literature review. Email at passenger vehicle@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 13.\r\nCheck over the final draft for grammar and punctuation mark errors. 14. Use the checklist provided here to make sure that all ramifys of the literature review are addressed and foc employ. Establishing a Critical Response for a Literature Review You may find thi s section helpful at Steps 3, 4 and 5 of the process. When reviewing your sources, explore the following field of forces to help develop your critical response: What is the purpose of the research or work? What research or literary methods are used? How do the get word concepts operate? In a research study, how accurate are the measurements?\r\nIn a literary work, is the author’s baffle objective or bleached? What are the different interpretations of the results of the study or of the literary work itself? freshen up 1. What do you rate to be the most life-or-death step(s) in the process of your literature review? why? apologize your response(s). Organization A literature review can be arranged either locally or chronologically. Topical organization occurs in reviews where previous research being evaluated is divided into segments with each one representing a part of some larger issue.\r\nIn a topical review, the author begins by describing the characteristics of res earch share by several studies and thusly moves on to analyze their similarities and differences. For more information, see the example below. slip The organization of a literature review begins in the introduction. For example, in the introduction of a literature review approximately the effect of position placements on chum tutoring communication, you would first introduce the topic and what your literature review will attempt to assess: … composition gists can set the dodge for cooperative tutoring sessions through a thoughtful consideration of spacial order of battle .\r\n. . Then state what angle is going to be explored: …These studies will be used to support the author’s claims that spatial arrangement is subservient in encouraging cooperative surrounds in the compose center… Then, arrange key issues that will be addressed in this review by answer questions that you have someoneally real and are tailored to fit your topic. In the intr oduction, give the audience a clear enter of how you will organize your paper: Email at tutor@uhv. edu University West, room 129.\r\n(361) 570-4288 In the following, I1 first review some relevant research concerning spatial arrangement and then discuss some recommended and alternate seating arrangements to come along a collaborative environment in the compose center. Finally, I include some other considerations. In the body of this literature review, you would organize the information topically around each point (or question) that you asked yourself: -Research Review -Recommended Spatial agreement -Alternative Spatial Arrangement -Other Considerations.\r\nThen, issue a conclusion that explains the consequence of your findings: …While the seating arrangements defined above are slackly a good ‘ lay’ for peer tutoring sessions, we should remember that each tutoring session is unique. Not all students will be palmy with a side-by-side spatial arrangement at a round table.\r\nTutors should be perceptive of and receptive to students who may have other spatial needs… chronological organization occurs when a review is organized in time order and is most often used when a historic context is needed for discussing a topic from its beginning to its incumbent state; chronological organization is especially helpful when discussing unchanging periods and shifts in perspective on a given topic.\r\nExample The organization of a literature review begins in the introduction. For example, in the introduction of a literature review entitled education of Social Science Research on Attitudes Towards Gender in America, you would first introduce the topic and what your review hopes to assess: …This literature review will assess the development of research designed to uncover gender attitudes in America during the latter part of the 20th Century…\r\nThen state what angle is going to be explored: .. As research progressed throughout t he 20th century, the methods that social scientists use for measuring these attitudes true and changed as well… Then, chronologically arrange issues that will be addressed in this review: Gender stereotypes still live today, and change attitudes can be traced over the medieval lambert years. keep an eye on instruments used to ruck data on these varying attitudes have similarly changed drastically over the course of time.\r\nIn the body of this literature review, you would organize the information chronologically, adressing each point (or question) that is being asked for a particular time period: -Stereotypes and horizon Instruments of the 1950’s -Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1960’s -Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1970’s -Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1980’s -Stereotypes and Survey Instruments of the 1990’s -Current Advancements Always clear the use of I with your instructor.\r\nAn alternative to this would be the use of third person wording, such as â€Å"This paper reviews some relevant research concerning spatial arrangement and then discusses some recommended and alternate seating arrangements to encourage a collaborative environment in the constitution center. ” 1 Email at tutor@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 Then, save a conclusion that explains the implication of your findings: Although the heap instruments used in the 1950’s and 1960’s veritable an obvious bias when analyse Americans regarding gender attitudes, the 1970’s brought somewhat great change.\r\nToday social scientists are more careful than ever about interrogation the quality of a survey instrument before development it on the general public. Format There are also two suggested formats for composing your literature review. Format A is used when comparing several studies that have similar hypothesis barely different findings. Each piece of research is summarized individually. Format A is good for reviews with a teensy-weensy number of entries; however, this format may confuse the audience when used with a large number of reviews because descriptions of so many studies may get in the way of the analysis.\r\nKeep in estimation that each piece of research usually will not receive equal attention in the review. Format A Outline I. Introduction consists of quatern parts that are usually discussed in one paragraph. a. call the general topic being discussed. b. mark trends published about the topic. c. country thesis establishing the effort for writing the literature review. d. Explain criteria by giving a description of each of the criteria used in evaluating the literature review and rationalizing its organization II. Literature reviewed section is divided up fit to study. a. depression study is summarized and discussed. b.\r\n punt study is summarized and discussed. c. Third study is summarized and discussed. III. Comparati ve analysis acknowledges the similarities and differences between studies. a. Similarities (if any) among the studies are evaluated and discussed. b. Differences (if any) among the studies are evaluated and discussed. IV. inference/Summary effectively wraps up the review. a. Summarize points of comparison or contrast among the works based on Section III of your review. b. Provide insight of relationship between the topic of the review and a larger area of study such as a specific discipline or profession Format B.\r\norganizes the literature review according to similarities and differences among research rather than by literature studied. In a review organized according to Format B, little mise en scene information on the literature being reviewed is given outright. Instead, it is worked into the body paragraphs of the sections on similarities and differences. The conclusion then uses these two sections (similarities and differences) to tie in points of comparison and contrast bet ween the works. Format B advance suits papers that are topically organized.\r\nFormat B is outline below. Email at tutor@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 Format B Outline I. Introduction consists of four parts usually discussed in one paragraph. a. Identify the general topic being discussed. b. Mention trends published about the topic. c. State thesis establishing the reason for writing the literature review. d. Explain criteria by giving a description of each of the criteria used in evaluating the literature review and rationalizing its organization II. Similiarities within the research are discussed. a.\r\nFirst similarity among research is discussed. b. Second similarity among research is discussed. c. Third similiarity among research is discussed. III. Differences in the research are discussed. a. First difference between research is discussed b. Second difference between research is discussed c. Third difference between research is discussed IV. ending/Summ ary a. Summarize points of comparison or contrast between the works. b. Provide insight into relationship between the topic of the literature and a larger area of study such as a specific discipline or profession.\r\nThe most important thing to remember when organizing a literature review is that it is not a list summarizing one work after another. The review should be organized into sections according to theme that are set apart by subject-related headings. REVIEW 1. Which format have you elect for your literature review? Why? A Literature Review Checklist: Did I . . . . . . ? ? Establish a valid thesis based on the examined research ? State this thesis clearly in my introduction ? Define unfamiliar terms ? Incorporate punctuate information to define the problem ?\r\nBegin each entry in the review with a complete bibliographical reference ? List and describe the hypothesis/thesis in each work reviewed Email at tutor@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288 ? attract the outcome of the work or the research ? Develop and incorporated my own comments, including response to the research, similarities and differences among literature reviewed, and reservations regarding author’s methods or conclusions ? Avoid overquoting ? Check for grammar and punctuation errors ? Correctly cite all references in uniform corroboration style Resources Brightwell, G.\r\nand Shaw, J. (1997-98). written material up research. Retrieved deluxe 20, 2002 from Languages and Educational culture at the Asian set of Technology’s tissue page at http://www. languages. ait. ac. th/EL21OPEN. HTM Central Queensland University Library. (2000). The literature review. Retrieved July 22, 2003 from http://www. library. cqu. edu. au/litreviewpages/ Cuba, L. (2002). A short guide to writing about social science. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishers. Leibensperger, S. (2003). Setting the table: Encouraging collaborative environments with spatial arrangement in the writing ce nter.\r\nUnpublished literature review. Union Arizona University. (1999). Electronic schoolbook †A clap from the past: Your literature review. Retrieved whitethorn 30, 2002 from http://jan. ucc. nau. edu/~mid/edr720/class/literature/blast/reading21-1. hypertext markup language Taylor, D. , & Procter, M. (2001). The literature review: A few tips on conducting it. Retrieved June 17, 2002 from http://www. utoronto. ca/writing/litrev. html Trinder, L. (2002). Appendix. The literature review. Retrieved August 27, 2003 http://www. uea. ac. uk/~w071/teaching/ppf/Appendix%20Lit%20Review.\r\npdf The University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center. (2001). Academic writing: Reviews of literature. Retrieved May 30, 2002 from http://www. wisc. edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature. html *In traditional APA style, this section would be entitled â€Å"References” and would be listed on a fragmentize page double- setd. Due to space constraints in this packet, it has been format ted differently. Copyright 2003 by the Academic Center and the University of Houston-Victoria. Created 2003 by Candice Chovanec-Melzow. Email at tutor@uhv. edu University West, room 129 (361) 570-4288.\r\n'